I've been to México and back... (Sounds like a song!) and now I am beginning to do some serious studying. So the question is do I keep on posting or let the journal die?
If I keep it up it will be filled with musing about the Tenochteca Excan Tlatoloyan (Aztec Triple Alliance in common parlance), Spain in the 16th Century and the horrible time of the invasion of the Carribean islands and correlating bits of information.
For instance, just today there was a post on the Stirling list about an Island called St. Kilda in the western Hebrides of Scotland. These people were evacuated in the early 1930's. St. Kilda seems to derive, not from any saint but from a mislabeling of the name of the sweetwater spring that made it habitable in the beginning... Called Tobar Childa (both words mean "well", one in Galic and one Norse) it slid into a more "logical" name for the later visitors = St. Kilda. The wikipedia entry has a lot of discussion on the possible evolution of the name. But I like "well, well." It reminds me of the wiki entry for "mole," a generic name for many spicy sauces used in México as feast day food.
Queen Chihuapilli of Michoacan is supposed to have invented it to go on human flesh and the good frairs coaxed her into using it only on pig flesh. My grin there is that "Cihuapilli" means female noble, and of the lowest class, sort of like Baroness, so "Queen Lower noble."
The noteworthy things about St. Kilda, for me are the probably survival of the folk religion up until the early 18th century and the reaction to the disease environment brought by the ships. Also the influence of just one or two people on the island's population is of interest.
How much can I infer as universal behavior, how much is unique to the conquest of México and how much can be seen as correlation. Did they occur for the same reasons or different reasons and just look the same?
In a few months I'll be giving a talk of the survival of pagan systems of belief among the Nahuatl of the Sierra Oriental of México, known as the Huasteca region. It's a bit of an "I am going to eat crow," talk, since I always believed what I was taught... that the pagan religions vanished within a few years of the conquest. Learning that the "conquest' was a long drawn out proceedure and that the religions did not vanish easily or completely was a bit of a shock to me.
After all, all those dances in front of the cathedral in indian dress with feather headdresses and rattles on the ankles and wrists were catholic right? Ummm... there is a considerable amount of re-evaluation I've undergone since I started my journey.
So maybe I'll use this as my sounding board and if people like it they can comment.